learning criteria
This archive contains 1 research paper tagged learning criteria. Open the original sources to see their methods, findings and limitations. A topic label does not establish that neurofeedback is suitable or effective for it.
Research Papers
Operant (biofeedback) control of left-right frontal alpha power differences: Potential neurotherapy for affective disorders
Two experiments were done with subjects from a paid pool of undergraduates. In each study, there were five 1-hour sessions on each of 5 days: (1) Baseline: Rewards given for randomly selected 20% of the 700-ms sequential epochs; mean and SD of baseline power differences determined. 2) Exploration: Subjects were rewarded when right minus left alpha differences in an epoch were greater than the baseline mean plus about .85 SD (p = .20); subjects told to discover how to generate rewards. (3)–(5). Training: Subjects were paid (over and above the $8/h flat rate) in proportion to their hit rates. In the first study (in which active filters passed 8–12 Hz activity, and the rectified, integrated amplitude was utilized), 6 of 8 subjects met learning criteria (a significant difference between baseline and training scores). In the second study (in which on-line FFTs were used to extract alpha power), 3 of 5 subjects met learning criteria.
View Full Paper →Topics in the same sources
Questions about Peak Brain programs?
Ask about our QEEG assessments and neurofeedback programs, including their scope and whether they fit your goals.
Or call us directly at 855-88-BRAIN
View Programs & Pricing →