Publication Bias

This archive contains 1 research paper tagged Publication Bias. Open the original sources to see their methods, findings and limitations. A topic label does not establish that neurofeedback is suitable or effective for it.

1 itemGet Started →

Research Papers

The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based conclusions about the disorder

Faraone, Stephen V., Banaschewski, Tobias, Coghill, David, Zheng, Yi, Biederman, Joseph, Bellgrove, Mark A., Newcorn, Jeffrey H., Gignac, Martin, Al Saud, Nouf M., Manor, Iris, Rohde, Luis Augusto, Yang, Li, Cortese, Samuele, Almagor, Doron, Stein, Mark A., Albatti, Turki H., Aljoudi, Haya F., Alqahtani, Mohammed M. J., Asherson, Philip, Atwoli, Lukoye, Bölte, Sven, Buitelaar, Jan K., Crunelle, Cleo L., Daley, David, Dalsgaard, Søren, Döpfner, Manfred, Espinet, Stacey, Fitzgerald, Michael, Franke, Barbara, Gerlach, Manfred, Haavik, Jan, Hartman, Catharina A., Hartung, Cynthia M., Hinshaw, Stephen P., Hoekstra, Pieter J., Hollis, Chris, Kollins, Scott H., Sandra Kooij, J. J., Kuntsi, Jonna, Larsson, Henrik, Li, Tingyu, Liu, Jing, Merzon, Eugene, Mattingly, Gregory, Mattos, Paulo, McCarthy, Suzanne, Mikami, Amori Yee, Molina, Brooke S. G., Nigg, Joel T., Purper-Ouakil, Diane, Omigbodun, Olayinka O., Polanczyk, Guilherme V., Pollak, Yehuda, Poulton, Alison S., Rajkumar, Ravi Philip, Reding, Andrew, Reif, Andreas, Rubia, Katya, Rucklidge, Julia, Romanos, Marcel, Ramos-Quiroga, J. Antoni, Schellekens, Arnt, Scheres, Anouk, Schoeman, Renata, Schweitzer, Julie B., Shah, Henal, Solanto, Mary V., Sonuga-Barke, Edmund, Soutullo, César, Steinhausen, Hans-Christoph, Swanson, James M., Thapar, Anita, Tripp, Gail, van de Glind, Geurt, van den Brink, Wim, Van der Oord, Saskia, Venter, Andre, Vitiello, Benedetto, Walitza, Susanne, Wang, Yufeng (2021) · Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews

BACKGROUND: Misconceptions about ADHD stigmatize affected people, reduce credibility of providers, and prevent/delay treatment. To challenge misconceptions, we curated findings with strong evidence base. METHODS: We reviewed studies with more than 2000 participants or meta-analyses from five or more studies or 2000 or more participants. We excluded meta-analyses that did not assess publication bias, except for meta-analyses of prevalence. For network meta-analyses we required comparison adjusted funnel plots. We excluded treatment studies with waiting-list or treatment as usual controls. From this literature, we extracted evidence-based assertions about the disorder. RESULTS: We generated 208 empirically supported statements about ADHD. The status of the included statements as empirically supported is approved by 80 authors from 27 countries and 6 continents. The contents of the manuscript are endorsed by 366 people who have read this document and agree with its contents. CONCLUSIONS: Many findings in ADHD are supported by meta-analysis. These allow for firm statements about the nature, course, outcome causes, and treatments for disorders that are useful for reducing misconceptions and stigma.

View Full Paper →

Topics in the same sources

Course Genetics Network Meta-Analysis outcome diagnosis treatment

Browse All Topics →

Questions about Peak Brain programs?

Ask about our QEEG assessments and neurofeedback programs, including their scope and whether they fit your goals.

Or call us directly at 855-88-BRAIN

View Programs & Pricing →