reinforcement
reinforcement relates to brain function and cognitive performance. Peak Brain Institute explores how QEEG brain mapping and neurofeedback training connect to reinforcement through evidence-based approaches. Explore our 2 research papers covering this topic.
Research Papers
Neurofeedback—The Significance of Reinforcement and the Search for an Appropriate Strategy for the Success of Self-regulation
Nine healthy children took part in five sessions of feedback and instrumental conditioning of slow cortical potentials (SCPs). The feedback conditions (the relation between the feedback signal and amplitude of SCP) were inverted after two sessions. Neither the children nor the therapists were aware of this change. The adjustment of the children to the new feedback setting and the self-regulation strategies employed were investigated. The results were as follows: (a) Healthy children achieved control over cortical negativity within two sessions. (b) The change of feedback conditions worsened the regulation abilities, which then improved again within the following three sessions. (c) After the first two sessions, the participants were able to describe strategies that were successful during different phases of self-regulation. (d) Following the change in the feedback conditions, the children re-evaluated the way they influenced their SCPs. However, they did not alter the cognitive or behavioral strategies. The study demonstrated that positive and negative reinforcement and the knowledge of results are more important for successful self-regulation than the search for effective strategies. The relevance of these findings is discussed.
View Full Paper →Eight to Twelve Hertz Occipital EEG Training with Moderate and Severely Retarded Epileptic Individuals
Three retarded epileptic individuals, with a variety of seizure disorders, were provided with 8-12 Hz occipital EEG biofeedback training. While seizures were not totally eliminated in any of the subjects, the results of the study indicated that all subjects exhibited decreases in some aspect of their seizure activity. The inability of all of the subjects to increase 8-12 Hz activity may best be explained in terms of the differing degree of effectiveness of the feedback stimuli in terms of their functionality as reinforcers. The results of the study indicate that changes in procedures will be necessary in order to determine if 8-12 Hz occipital EEG training is effective in reducing epileptic seizures.
View Full Paper →Related Topics
Ready to Optimize Your Brain?
Schedule a free consultation to discuss reinforcement and how neurofeedback training can help
Or call us directly at 855-88-BRAIN
View Programs & Pricing →