randomized
Research on randomized informs evidence-based practice in neurofeedback and QEEG assessment. Peak Brain Institute stays current with randomized findings to ensure our protocols reflect the latest scientific understanding. Explore our 2 research papers covering this topic.
Research Papers
Influence of electroencephalography neurofeedback training on episodic memory: A randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind study
The relationships between memory processes and oscillatory electroencephalography (EEG) are well established. Neurofeedback training (NFT) may cause participants to better regulate their brain EEG oscillations. The present study is a double-blind sham-controlled design investigating the effect of NFT on memory. NFT included up-training upper alpha (UA) band, up-training sensory-motor rhythm (SMR) band and sham protocol. Thirty healthy adult volunteers were randomly divided into three treatment groups. NFT sessions (30 min each) took place twice weekly for a total of 10 sessions while memory testing took place pre- and post-training. The results indicate dissociation between SMR and UA NFT and different memory processes. While the SMR protocol resulted in improving automatic, item-specific and familiarity-based processes in memory, the UA protocol resulted in improved strategic and controlled recollection. The implications of the results are discussed.
View Full Paper →Effects of Neurofeedback Training on Inhibitory Capacities in ADHD Children: A Single-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study
Studies performed during the last decades suggest that neurofeedback (NF) training can effectively reduce symptomatology in children with Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Yet questions remain concerning specific effects of NF training in ADHD children, because these studies did not use a randomized, placebo-controlled approach. To address this issue, such an approach was used in the present study to measure the impact of NF training on inhibitory capacities. Method. Nine ADHD children (with no comorbidity), aged 8 to 13 years, were randomly assigned to either an experimental group (n1/45) or a placebo group (n1/44). For both groups, training protocols comprised 40 one-hr sessions (20 meetings of 2 sessions each). Sensorimotor rhythm=Theta training was used in the experimental group. Prerecorded sessions of the first author's EEG activity were used in the placebo group. Pre- and posttraining assessments consisted of the Conner's Parent Rating Scales (CPRS-R) and neuropsychological tests. A multiple case study strategy was applied for data analysis using a Reliable Change Index when applicable. Results. One experimental participant was a dropout, and one placebo participant had to be discontinued due to adverse effects. The latter participant accepted to undergo posttraining evaluations; hence an Intention-to-Treat analysis was performed on this participant's data. Remaining participants showed significant improvements on the CPRS-R. Improvements were measured on the Variability measure of the CPT-II consistently across the placebo group and on the Inhibition Condition of the Stroop Task for all but one placebo participant. The same trend was found for the Inhibition=Switching Condition (Stroop Task) across the experimental group (n1/44). Conclusion. The small sample size precludes from evaluating specific neurofeedback effects. Still, the presence of placebo responses suggests that other factors, such as motivation or expectations, might contribute to the outcome of NF training in children with ADHD.
View Full Paper →Related Topics
Ready to Optimize Your Brain?
Schedule a free consultation to discuss randomized and how neurofeedback training can help
Or call us directly at 855-88-BRAIN
View Programs & Pricing →